after crunching some #s yesterday, i realized that if i wager 1% of bankroll on every play starting with a $5000 bank and hitting at 56% of 345 games bet would increase my bank by $1250 or 25%.(193w-152loss) i dont mind the time that it takes to grind out a profit if you are lucky enough to win 56% of your plays, but i cannot say with confidence that i can win 55 or 56% of a very large sample of plays, and volume plays a large part when risking only 1% of bank per play. so i decided to play 2team parlays in a sequence of 1-10 assigning a $value to each #. the idea is to win 1 parlay before losing 10 consecutively. when a play is won, add the profit to bank and start back at the top of the sequence. i think that i might stand a better chance going 2 and 0 one out of every 10 chances than i do of hitting 56% of 345 plays that would be necessary for a $1250 profit. i wont be too surprised if this doesnt prove to be profitable, just as i am sure most of you wont be surprised if you dont hit more than 59% of large # of plays. here is the sequence: #1 $10
#2 $20
#3 $30
#4 $50
#5 $80
#6 $110
#7 $160
#8 $200
#9 $300
#10 $425
remember when a parlay is won bank the profit and start over from #1. last night i lost the #1 play winning with unlv but losing with texas leaving me -$10 and a total bank of $4990. tonights i will be risking $20 to win $52 on clemson+17.5 and wisconsin+3
#2 $20
#3 $30
#4 $50
#5 $80
#6 $110
#7 $160
#8 $200
#9 $300
#10 $425
remember when a parlay is won bank the profit and start over from #1. last night i lost the #1 play winning with unlv but losing with texas leaving me -$10 and a total bank of $4990. tonights i will be risking $20 to win $52 on clemson+17.5 and wisconsin+3
